Roman Reset

I was always interested in history. The past seemed so much more interesting than the mundane present. I love the fashions of centuries past and tales of adventure. I loved to read and picked up a lot, I thought, about the past from reading novels, some of them written long ago.

Today, I come to the conclusion that history is one of the most confusing areas of study because it does not tell facts. It has been said that those who win the wars are the ones who write the histories, and that is true. But it goes far beyond lying about the reasons for the wars, exaggerating the atrocities of the losers, and whitewashing the atrocities of the winners. Apparently, the winners of the last major victory on Earth lied about the state of the whole world.

We know of World War I and World War II, but it is interesting that Hitler called his dream of establishing an empire the Third Reich. Why the Third? I believe it was because World War II was actually World War III, and it isn't World War III we are actually engaged in now, but World War IV.

There was a global war before what we know as World War I. It was the overthrow of the Tartarian Empire. I started hearing about the Tartarians/Tatarians in 2019 and realized that we, indeed, have been lied to our whole lives about the history of the world. After the time of Christ, the histories are not reliable. Even some of the history between the Flood and His time has been altered, to present us with a Roman empire that, I think, was not as grand as we have been led to believe.

I think that it was a rising power, but did not continue to wax stronger and stronger after the Romans crucified Jesus. I think that, for the part it played in His torture and death, Rome suffered a judgment in the form of a rival empire that took over its captured lands and forced the Roman imperialists to go underground for a time, existing above ground as the Catholic church, but not as influential as history makes it out to be.

There is vast evidence in old photographs that the Tartarians had very sophisticated technology and widespread governance. Their fantastic architecture and technology shows up all over the world. They used free energy and the symbols of it are everywhere, which includes the swastika, a representation of a vortex observed in nature, the principles of which were utilized in the production of free energy.

The cathedrals, temples, pagodas, mosques, castles, and great houses were machines, engines that generated energy for heat, light, motion, and lush agricultural growth, utilizing sound, water, geometric shapes, and mercury. Radio and television probably existed back then, not for entertainment, but for government and military communication between territories.

Much of what is claimed to be Roman architecture is actually Tartarian. Pillars and arches were constructed everywhere on Earth to conduct energy, even in places where nobody claims that the Romans ventured. There are star forts all over the planet, which were part of a grid for a global free energy system. They were power stations. These star–shaped stations are found in Australia and the Americas, as well as in Europe and Asia, and are probably in Africa, too.

So, if there were power stations in North America, what did they provide power for? Native tribes living in tents and wigwams? Old photos show San Francisco with very fancy architecture before the earthquake that destroyed most of it. Why all those elaborate churches and mansions, in a city where the scarcity of the population did not justify it? Why would people who were struggling to survive take the time, and have the resources, and the technology to build to that extent? Why were the streets deserted in broad daylight?

A lot of the old photos of the 19th century show cities with deserted streets. It has been explained that they were taken in the early morning before people were out and about. In a photo of San Francisco, however, it was pointed out that the shadows being cast on the street were short, which means the photo was taken around noon. But besides that, workers in the olden days often began their day before dawn, and were certainly engaged in labour even during early daylight hours.

Around the end of the 19th century, a lot of North American towns burned to the ground. Early in the 20th century, beautiful mansions were torn down, on the excuse that they were too expensive to maintain. World's fairs were torn down, too. All those fabulous buildings were apparently erected in only months or less than two years, then dynamited or burned. It has been conjectured that they were actually around for hundreds of years, but dismantled to cover up the free energy empire that ruled the Earth before the petroleum cabal took over.

I think that they existed long before they were supposedly constructed, that they were exhibits of Tartarian conquests and innovations. Old film shows the buildings copiously glowing with electric lights, which would have been a nightmare of wiring, except that they utilized wireless energy. The old films also show people in Edwardian dress standing on moving sidewalks. Old film shows people using some very clever inventions that we consider only recent, such as women in Edwardian dress using electric scooters. That must have been a handy way to keep their long skirts clean from dusty streets.

The world's fairs that were torn down were probably the conquerors' last look at the old technology before they more forcefully pushed their own version of history, which required the 20th century general public to be much more ignorant of world history for the purpose of being more easily manipulated. It sure makes me wonder what my grandparents knew of the old world and never talked about, or what their parents knew and never told them. It was probably understood that talking about the suppressed history would land people in trouble with the government.

There are so many amazing, intricate, immense buildings around the world that were supposedly built by people who operated at a low level of technology, transporting huge blocks of stone by horse and cart on rough roads. If the people who built those cathedrals and castles and estates really lived at a very basic level, struggling to survive, how would they have the imagination and energy to build those monuments to engineering that modern engineers can't figure out how it was done, and would cost billions of dollars in today's currency for the materials, tools, expertise, and labour?

It was pointed out that, though such exquisite detail went into constructing cathedrals, the roads were rough and appear muddy and uneven in the old photos and films. Why would this be overlooked by the builders? It would not be overlooked. The roads were overlaid with a mud flood.

There are a lot of photos of world–wide mud flood evidence on the Internet. Not photos of buildings built on top of other buildings, but of lower stories being uncovered that employed the same architectural features of the building that could be seen above ground. For instance, pillars under the ground that lined up with the pillars seen above ground. Some photos were taken of people shovelling in the mud around large buildings with complex architectural style.

It is evident that some type of weapon was used that liquified the ground, so recovering buildings was needed, but there are photos that could also be interpreted as canals being filled in, that were used as part of the free energy system. The star stations were all surrounded with water, at one time, as part of their equipment, but most of the canals were filled in.

It feels creepy to contemplate how the photos where there are no people were taken, by a survivor of war, of the victorious side, taking photos of a deserted city, the day hot, the air still, and all is silent except for the chirp of birds and rustling of small animals nearby. Victory photos to show the new rulers and generals their handiwork, and to be used for planning, as well.

Planning what areas to repopulate first and with whom. A video I listened to pointed out some peculiarities of the Victorian age. There were hundreds of thousands of orphans. Where did they all come from? They were housed in huge buildings before being sent off to work houses and factories, or overseas or transported by train across continents to be "adopted." Enslaved, in many cases, rather than ending up in loving families.

Little children as young as seven years old, possibly even younger, worked in mines. Photos show them working at machines that were constructed to be operated by adults. Small children were sent down chimneys to clean them out, as the chimneys were too narrow for adults to fit in, and there were no tools that could do the job without putting humans at risk of their health. Were these chimneys made on purpose with the notion of children being set to work to clean them? No. They were not intended for wood or coal fires. They drew down energy into homes.

Some of these children obviously were survivors of the war that was won against the Tartarians. But many of them were the bastard children of unmarried women. It looks like there was an epidemic of sexual immorality going on at that time, but that was the Victorian era, where virginity was highly prized in brides and loose women were scorned.

I have surmised that a lot of men were killed in the war, and surviving men still loyal to Tartaria put to death afterwards, so women vastly outnumbered men. The population needed to be built up. Labourers were needed, especially since the free energy technology was being dismantled and the population was being busted down to survivor mode, to keep them too busy meeting their basic needs to form uprisings against new governments

I think that, for a time, immorality was encouraged. The government needed those women, who hadn't a hope of finding a husband because there weren't enough men, to get pregnant and birth a work force, as well as to repopulate the deserted lands that had been emptied in the war. They needed children who would know nothing of Tartarian history and its glories, who would be accustomed to poverty, be grateful for even small improvements in lifestyle, and could be programmed to serve the new masters.

Once the repopulation program was well under way, the British government turned on the women and passed laws that marginalized them, making them solely responsible for the support of their children, the fathers freed of all responsibility towards bastard children, and the children themselves denied citizenship and legal rights. That left them at the mercy of the government, which was harsh indeed.

Business owners refused to employ unmarried women who had children. To survive, women were forced to give up their children to "baby farmers." These people sold the children to be slaves, some may have been adopted by kindly couples, and some were deliberately killed, no questions asked about their deaths, as they were sickly or too young to be useful. Mothers giving up their children knew they would never see them again.

Novelists were employed to write stories that presented a false picture of the times. Charles Dickens was included in that, but he was distressed by the orphan situation and tried, in his way, to bring them some social justice.

History books were written, to present the conquerors' version of past events, most notably to my mind, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, published in 1776, probably shortly after the fall of the Tartarians in Britain. The new cabal had to carefully balance the narrative of its history, so that people would not be aware that it was the Roman Empire rising to take over the world, as the born–again Christians would get suspicious and not cooperate due to the prophecy in the Book of Revelation where the Roman church bears a great resemblance to an international authority called the Great Whore of Babylon, mother of harlots, and ruler over the kings of the Earth.

Movies in modern times are geared towards giving the public a false narrative of history. Some of them show London as heavily populated at a time when it actually might have been almost deserted. The script writers might have no idea that they are presenting a false history, having done their research from the approved histories, but there are people who probably make sure that they get funding to produce those movies.

I think that the Catholic church, a surviving remnant of the Roman empire, was the primary driver in the conquest of the Tartarians, but they couldn't do it all on their own, so the Vatican insurgents worked with other churches and religions in the nations, thinking that they would take over those churches and religions later on, when it was more firmly established.

I think that Byzantium, the city that the Catholics renamed Constantinople, was probably a Tartarian city and, thus, a strong rival to the Roman empire, with its history rewritten to give the Catholic church and Roman empire more prestige in the history books. It was a rival, but probably not a breakaway from Rome. It was probably just a Tartarian city that practiced a form of Catholicism, and its proximity to Rome making it a key player in bringing down the Roman empire before being taken down itself, to replace its religion with Islam.

By the way, the crescent moon is only a relatively recent symbol of Islam. It is on many spires of cathedrals. The crosses and crescents were not placed there to represent Christianity or Islam. They are symbols of mercury, a key component of the energy system they used, and which the Tartarians obviously worshipped, as their access to this energy helped make them wealthy and powerful.

Learning all this stuff about Tartaria makes me rethink something I read in a book by John G. Lake, who operated in a powerful healing ministry in the early 20th century. Interestingly, he held some of his meetings in a Masonic lodge. The Mason cult had a lot to do with rewriting history, apparently. In John G. Lake's time, they were probably considered very necessary players in the reset, their paganism overlooked, because their help was needed to vanquish the evil Tartarians.

There was an incident where God took Lake in the Spirit to the home of a man who was oppressed by his selfish wife. He looked at her countenance, as she sat at a table reading a magazine, and, in his mind, judged her to be a "Tartar." When I read this, I just attributed it to his knowledge of stories about fierce warriors who lived long ago in central Asia. Now I think of it as Lake knowing something of the Tartarians' more recent history. The mud flood videos present Tartaria as a sort of world–wide utopia, but I highly doubt that theirs was a just society.

It probably somewhat resembled a steampunk world. It has been noted how skies seem to be whited out in old photos, and that this might be attributed to flying machines that they had back then that the authorities didn't want the public to know about after the reset. I'm pretty certain they had flying machines. How else can one explain the amazing precision and symmetry of the star stations? It has been pointed out that the land had to be viewed from above to map out the plans for them.

Something I noticed when reading steampunk stories a few years ago, while going through a backsliding phase; there was a lot of vampirism in them. I couldn't get very far into those stories before I stopped reading because of the vampire element brought in, as well as other oppressive activities. Those stories make me wonder if the Tartarian societies were heavily engaged in slavery and vampirism. There was plenty of sorcery involved in their early history, with cannibalism involved, and stuff like that goes from bad to worse, unless there is a widespread turning to God among the rulers that switches things around.

One of my heroes, George Muller, a German missionary to England, started taking in orphan children in 1836 and eventually built a large complex of houses for them in Bristol, but he restricted himself to providing shelter only for orphans whose parents had been legitimately married. I think that this was his way of trying to encourage single women to not succumb to the pressures of poverty and promiscuity, thus giving birth to vulnerable children who would be abused by society.

The Bible predicts in Isaiah 4:1 that there will come a time in the future when polygamy will be legal, for the purpose of repopulation. It says, "And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by your name, to take away our reproach."

Men will be so scarce that women will not be able to find a man with whom they can have a monogamous relationship. They will be sorry that they took birth control, or had abortions, going against the high privilege God gave them to birth children. They will want to have children, but they will also want their children to have legal rights, so they will settle for sharing a man in marriage with other women, though they will have to support themselves.

When I realized what this verse possibly meant, that the world will be so emptied of men that it will be rare to see them, I cried. It catapulted me into appreciating men more for their masculine qualities. I have a son, nephews, brothers, so precious to me. It was heart–breaking to consider the possibility of them being killed in war.

There must have been a lot of sad women in the 1800s, who lost their sons, nephews, brothers, and fathers. They must have been desperate to have family again, but what a betrayal when the government, after encouraging them to breed, even as unmarried women, then turned on them and said that they were no better than whores, their children had no rights, and it was solely up to them to provide for their needs, knowing full well that nobody would hire them unless they gave up their children to the government.

In North America, there were fairs that featured "infantoriums," where premature babies in incubators were put on display. The public paid to see them and was encouraged to adopt them. There were thousands of those babies for adoption. What happened to the mothers? Were they considered unsuitable to raise them, perhaps due to having attitudes that worked against the reset? Were their babies forcibly taken from them by Caesarean section or induced labour? The mothers were probably poor and single, no father of the child on the scene to protect them from being confiscated by the government.

These infantoriums were set up at a time when women were breaking away from the demure Victorian ideal of modest womanhood, demanding the right to vote, donning bathing costumes that bared their knees, eventually shortening their skirts, cutting their hair, smoking cigarettes in public, and dancing frantically to fast tunes, instead of being satisfied with the more sedate and subtle thrills of the waltz.

The videos I have seen about the Tartarians and their architecture and technology present them as good people who were conquered by evil ones. Yes, the conquerors were evil, as we evidently see by how they treated children and took advantage of the poor, but God doesn't judge a whole civilization until they have gone way too far into darkness, and are not willing to repent.

Without a doubt, the Tartarians were brilliant people, drawing from the brain pool of all humanity. They were not one ethnic group, though I believe that the core group, where the empire started in the area of eastern Europe and central Asia, were descendants of Japheth.

They did not necessarily look like how Tatars are usually depicted. Genghis Khan is said to have had red hair and blue green eyes. But the Tatars were not against marrying outside of their tribes, so their general looks in the east changed from Nordic to Asian. There are a lot of stories about them stealing brides from other tribes.

The Tartarians were not averse to the people they conquered having diverse religions or retaining aspects of their own culture; hence the artistry of conquered lands was expressed in the construction of their energy producing structures, though necessary geometric components had to be incorporated into their design, so some features were commonly found around the world.

Free energy must have afforded the Tartarians a lot of luxury, at least in the lifestyles of the upper classes. Ezekiel 16:48 – 50 speaks of what tends to happen to people when they get prosperous, but are self– centred and become idle. "As I live, says the Lord GOD, Sodom your sister has not done, she nor her daughters, as you have done, you and thy daughters. Behold, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore, I took them away as I saw good."

The narrator in a video I watched about Tartarian architecture said that the stately homes that incorporated free energy technology in them were actually farms, that the energy was for producing lush crops, and the farmers stayed in those fabulous homes. Not likely.

Most Tartarian rulers were probably aristocrats, proud of their bloodlines, and they probably had a feudal system where they utilized skilled labour and artists at low pay, or no pay, and the less clever in the lower classes worked the fields and burned wood or coal in their cottages or hovels. I have watched video of renovation on a cottage in England that was hundreds of years old, and there was no free energy technology built in; just a plain, old fireplace that burned wood or peat.

I think the narrator is right that some of those huge, elaborate buildings in the countryside were used as hospitals, healing centres that used water and sound as therapies for illness. We're hearing again about healing centres and med beds, and sound and light being used to heal.

Overseen by extra–terrestrials, no less, who will decide who gets to operate them, and who gets priority access to them. Visitors from other planets is an old gambit of satan's that he used before the Flood, his fallen angels pretending to be more highly evolved species that came to help humanity. Help humanity right into Hell. They can make the med beds appear to heal by removing spirits of infirmity – to replace them with stronger demons of delusion, to keep souls from being saved.

Yes, we are in World War IV, and Tartaria is rising again, some of the players wiser than the rest, knowing that wickedness will bring them down again, but others eager to embrace the occult, not realizing the depths of darkness it will take them into.

I can trace ancestors on my mother's side back to the 1700s in Warwickshire, an indentured servant who was shipped off to Virginia as a teenager for the crime of having forged some coins. Britain was colonizing on the east coast of America. Tartaria was already occupying territory there, but rebellion was seething under its surface

I surmise that, though Britain overcame the Tartarians in North America, the colonists in what is now the USA did not consider the new government enough of an improvement. Hence, the American Revolution, but the new Americans were on board with suppressing Tartarian history and the remnants who still remained on the continent, known as Indians. The ancestors of the Indians were probably of the peasant class, not considered important enough to kill off right away during the initial conquest.

I watched a video of an archeologist who lectured about pre–Columbian America. He said that North America wasn't always as wild as the Europeans found it when they came to colonize it in the 17th century. He said that the natives used to burn the undergrowth in the forests, to prevent catastrophic forest fires, and you could have galloped through the forests on horses with ease.

He said that the natives cleared a lot of land where they grew crops of maize. But he surmised that, when Columbus arrived on America's shores, he brought European diseases the natives had no antibodies to fight, and disease killed off so many that the land turned back to wilderness. I propose that it was war on Tartaria that killed off so many of the natives.

This is my theory of history, drawn from some of the clues I have seen in videos, clues that cannot be ignored. The clues say that we've been lied to on a massive scale. I'm trying to make sense of all the false narratives we've been told, sifting through them to find the particles of truth that have been retained to make them seem plausible.

I think that we're still being lied to, even in the videos that show evidence of Tartarian rulership of the Earth, but that's just the way things go here on Earth, with sinful mankind promoting their own agendas, or being used to promote agendas.

I see an attempt in the videos to cut Christians off from the Source of their power, and intimacy with Him, casting doubt on the veracity of the Bible and the God of the Bible, whilst giving a kind of lip service to Jesus, so as to not alienate us too quickly. It's a melange, though, of Christianity and New Age beliefs that the video makers seem to espouse, while demoting Christianity in the process.

Seriously, what are we left with, if we abandon our faith in God, as the Bible reveals Him to be? We'd be as helpless as any mortal, tossed around by winds of false doctrine, confused, enslaved by fear to the Father of Lies, and manipulated, without hindrance, by his minions.

And for the record, I don't believe that the Earth is flat. But if it turns out that the Earth really is flat, believing it to be a sphere isn't going to send me to Hell. I don't consider it to be a big deal, whether it's flat or spherical, but I suspect the flat Earth theory is a psyops with multiple applications, mostly to create confusion and division.

There is a glaring error in the assertion that the water canopy above the Earth still exists. It crashed during the Flood. Before the Flood, the Earth was watered by a mist, like a terrarium, and kept its temperature consistent. During the Flood, rain fell for the first time and continues to fall because the canopy is gone and a different watering system, one not so consistent and comfortable, replaced it.

The flat Earthers insist that the Earth has to be flat because water is always level at the top when it is poured into a container. Hence, it cannot curve around a globe. If resonance is so powerful, then why not? After all, the Bible says in Hebrews 3: 1 that all of creation is held together by the word of Jesus' power. If He wanted to make the Earth a sphere, encased within a bubble of hydrogen crystals, there was nothing that could stop Him from doing it. Even the laws of nature, as man understands them, have to submit to His word.

Christians, be wary of doctrines of demons mixed in with the beliefs and practices of the faction that is taking down the petroleum/pharmaceutical cabal. The new guys need our prayers to help bring freedom to the nations, but that freedom will not last for long, if Christians do not stay alert and in prayer for the new governments, to help them make righteous decisions, and do away with grievous laws that legalized crimes against humanity, such as abortion, euthanasia, and forced vaccination mandates.

Some of the people taking over are genuinely born again, but their minds need to be renewed like anyone else's who comes to Jesus, and they were probably more vigorously programmed to serve an antichrist agenda than the average person. It's a miracle that they have been able to get past some of it.

They need our prayer support, not our criticisms of how well they perform as a Christian. Give them some grace; pray about what needs to be corrected, and be thankful that they brought justice on people who were torturing and killing children to increase their satanic powers. Kat Kerr has prophesied that those who remain of that faction will go into hiding and reappear again closer to the end time, using a different identity.

It is a high privilege to be born at this amazing time in the Earth's history, to fulfill whatever missions that the Lord gives us. Here we were, a lot of us thinking our lives were so ordinary, and having no idea that we were born on the brink of an amazing adventure, a global reset that will bring freedom to the nations, not their genocide as planned. Our prayers matter. Through the Blood of Jesus, we have access to our Father, the Creator, and His help. For the redemption of mankind, Jesus offered up His life, then He took up His life again and brought us into it, so that we can help others to know Him and operate in life like there was no Fall, as lovers of God and rulers of His creation.